• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Bad Night Out

    Former City Council Candidate Arrested for Fighting


    Thursday, July 15, 2010
    By Tyler Hayden (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Although accounts of what exactly happened Saturday night vary wildly, everyone involved agrees on one thing: An argument between former city council candidate Justin Tevis and a bouncer at EOS Lounge escalated into a brawl that landed Tevis in jail. Tevis, a Tea Party activist, ran in last November’s city council election and came in 9th out of 13 candidates, receiving 2,475 votes.

    To hear Tevis tell it, he and his friend — Evan Howe, 27 — got into a verbal altercation with the door bouncer after he let in a group of girls that were accompanying Tevis and Howe, but refused to let the guys enter. Things reportedly got more heated when the employee asked Tevis and Howe for a cover charge, and they offered Euros as payment. According to 27-year-old Tevis, that’s when he and Howe left the bar and walked away and down the street, but were followed by the bouncer and, without provocation, were attacked. “I feared for my life and acted in self defense,” said Tevis.

    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman (file)

    After “grappling” with the bouncer, Tevis, who is a practicing martial artist and said he recognized and countered the moves the bouncer was trying to make against him — “He tried to put me in a headlock, and I heel-tripped him into the ground. I used my jujitsu to defend myself,” he said — claimed he and Howe went peacefully when the police were flagged down. “We didn’t resist arrest at all,” said Tevis.

    According to the police report, however, Tevis was the one that started the fight at around 1 a.m., grabbing the bouncer’s shirt outside the club and threatening to punch him. The report states that, at first, there was only one responding officer on the scene, but he was able to place Tevis in handcuffs with the help of the bouncer after “a short struggle.” Howe, reportedly, was another story. After directing the doorman to take Howe to the ground, the report states, the officer told Howe to stay down and put his hands behind his back, which he purportedly failed to do.

    Deploying his Taser, and zapping Howe in the back four times, the officer said he was forced to deliver several strikes to his ribs in an attempt to subdue him. Other responding officers eventually used “elbow strikes to the upper body” and were able to get Howe to comply. Tevis was charged with battery and resisting arrest — both misdemeanors — and Howe was booked for felony resisting arrest.

    In Tevis’s opinion, excessive force was used to place him and Howe in custody, and the EOS bouncer was way out of line in leaving his post and following the two to start trouble. “The key thing is I acted in self defense and was on public property,” he said. Of the police’s actions, Tevis stated, “What happened to my friend — it wasn’t right. I was lying on the ground and had to watch him get repeatedly kneed in the face after he was Tasered four times and couldn’t move.” The police report states Howe had “obvious injuries at the time of booking” but was medically cleared.

    Tevis said he’s examining his legal options — possibly filing assault charges against the bouncer and levying a formal complaint against the police department. “There always has to be a check on authority, and whether you’re a bouncer or a police officer, it doesn’t give you free reign to act negligently.”

    Related Links

    • Profile of Justin Tevis
    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    What an arrogant punk! I witnessed the incident. Maybe you should "check" yourself and your buddy. Just as you say there should be a "check" on authority. You guys were a couple of drunk, self-entitled idiots. I hope you are prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Jerks!

    cattleman36 (anonymous profile)
    July 15, 2010 at 5:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    A "Tea Party activist" trying to pay with Euros?

    Cannot make up this up!

    David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
    July 15, 2010 at 6:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Cattleman, what did you see and how does it differ with the story here? Also, do you feel the police acted properly when beating and tasing the young man who was with Tevis? Did you give a statement to the arresting officers? Are you a co-worker of the bouncer or just someone who happened upon the scene? Finally, you say these guys were drunk but the police do not mention alcohol as being involved and no BAL test was given to either man after they were arrested. Would you be willing to testify to their obvious intoxication?

    Zevonfan (anonymous profile)
    July 15, 2010 at 7:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Too many bars, too many drunks, too many fights, too much of our tax dollars wasted. Rezone and limit bars just like the dispensaries. Where are the "red sweaters ?" Yep, at home, passed out on booze and prescription medication.

    Mugu (anonymous profile)
    July 15, 2010 at 7:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Tevis is a menace to society.

    EZK (anonymous profile)
    July 15, 2010 at 10:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    I watched this incident unfold. These two clowns were absolute buffoons. It was an absolute pleasure to watch the police subdue these two jerks. They thought they were so tough. Every blow from the police was necessary and deserved by these idiots. Grow up you two little boys.

    Justinian (anonymous profile)
    July 15, 2010 at 12:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Pritchett beat me to this one. If nothing else, Tevis should be opposed to the internationalist concept of the Euro.

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    July 15, 2010 at 2:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Too much violence. One more reason I choose not to go downtown and spend my $$$. I liked it better in the days prior to S.B'.s pols selling out the locals so that the kiddies could go downtown and get drunk and raise hell.

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    July 15, 2010 at 2:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Mr. Clausen
    Any situation you find yourself in with Mr. Tevis is most likely to turn ugly. While NOT a fan of EOS specifically (in fact when I first heard this story I thought two Karmaic birds had been hit with one stone); learning the details only makes me think of Tevis with more disgust than before.

    EZK (anonymous profile)
    July 15, 2010 at 9:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    It sounds like excessive force was used by the cops. Multiple taser? Several strikes to the ribs?

    Maybe these guys were drunk and obnoxious, but my own recent experience with SB cops leads me to not trust them one iota.

    Local cops act as if they're above the law. At a minimum, they're rude and unhelpful. At worst, they're bullies who beat up or wrongfully arrest law abiding citizens on trumped up charges.

    Lars (anonymous profile)
    July 16, 2010 at 12:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    This is an awesome story! I almost spit out my coffee with laughter! Good job boys, thanks for making the news entertaining. The only thing better would be a Mel Gibson style racist loony tunes rant......

    Upper_State (anonymous profile)
    July 16, 2010 at 9:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Those who would stand in the circle to throw stones at these young men should first take a look in the mirror. Justin Tevis is innocent until proven guilty, unlike certain other former city council candidates who were actually convicted of crimes or according to court records, stiffed their creditors by filing bankruptcy. I know of one losing city council candidate who has a carbon footprint twice the size of an average person and yet he claims to be an environmentalist. How can anyone demand that others pay for their health care when they have such a blatant disregard for their own health. At least Tevis is not a hypocrite. Tevis claimed he was concerned about over zealous police officers and this story seems to back him up. Do any of us really want to see citizens beaten and repeatedly tased on our public streets? Do some research and you will find this is all too common of an occurrence in Santa Barbara. I recall Tevis standing up for others he felt were treated unjustly by the Santa Barbara justice system. Tevis is a passionate lover of liberty and it is a shame that partisan politics cause people to find joy in the unfortunate circumstances of others.

    Zevonfan (anonymous profile)
    July 16, 2010 at 10:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    these guys may be idiots, but so are the bouncers at EOS. I have heard a couple incidents just like this one from others experiencing the man-tality of the bouncer.

    spacey (anonymous profile)
    July 16, 2010 at 11:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    http://www.independent.com/news/2009/...

    ::: "I like personal responsibility, living free, taking the initiative, being able to compete, and being able to fail," [Tevis] said.
    [...snip...]

    ::: "There's graffiti all over the place that goes un-prosecuted," he said. "But if you're not wearing your seat belt, they'll pull you over and charge you $100." As part of his anti-gang strategy, Tevis said parents should be held accountable for the misdeeds of their children, and that in lieu of community service, juvenile offenders should be forced to participate in sports activities.
    [...snip...]

    ::: "That creates lotteries," [Tevis} objected, "of who gets in and who doesn't." As burly as he is, Tevis said he's been accosted by aggressive street people and supports tougher laws designed to "clean up downtown." Businesses have a right to operate without being harassed by the homeless, he said.

    Where Tevis's politics tend to be tough and uncompromising, in person he comes across sweet and congenial.
    [...snip...]

    binky (anonymous profile)
    July 16, 2010 at 12:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    to Zevonfan: I was leaving Eos as it happened. I do not know if it was excessive force or not, so please enlighten me. One person was down on the ground with their hands clenched in front of them. If the proper procedure is to have the hands behind them to place handcuffs on, what is the proper way to do so? And if that person refuses to do so, what should be the proper procedure? Once again, I do not know if it was excessive force or not, but I do know I saw the person in question refusing to put his hands behind is back and did see the policeman use several methods to try and get the hands behind the back. Yes, I saw the taser being used and the policeman hitting the man´s back.

    So once again I ask, what should be the proper procedure when a person refuses to comply?

    Inthemiddle (anonymous profile)
    July 16, 2010 at 2:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I worked in an emergency locked psych unit for many years and actually taught classes in managing assaultive behavior. We NEVER hit or tased people, even when they were really violent or aggressive. We assigned a person to each limb to make sure the person could not injure anyone else or themselves. We restrained the person in this manner and when we had the person immobilized we would work as a team to place the person in full leather restraints to transport them. We always used the very least force necessary. Sometimes we worked with police when they would bring in patients in police custody and I was often disgusted by the way the police treated patients. We would have a person fully restrained and the police office would strike the patient in some sort of attempt to punish the patient for making the policeman's job difficult. It is difficult to fully explain how to restrain a person without using violence but I could demonstrate various techniques. Maybe you know someone who works in mental health who could vouch for the different approach used by mental health technicians as opposed to police officers. You say the man had his hands in front of him; did he appear to be a danger to anyone at that point? Maybe he was disoriented and confused after being attacked by the bouncers. It seems like the aggressiveness of the police did not serve to calm the man down.

    Zevonfan (anonymous profile)
    July 16, 2010 at 5:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    "As part of his anti-gang strategy, Tevis said parents should be held accountable for the misdeeds of their children"

    Thank you for sharing that Binky and I will add my $.02 worth. Tevis is out of touch on this matter. Indeed there are lots of gang-type folks raising children but when you have a society where parents are working two to three jobs, where kids are raised by the schools/afterschool programs which are not allowed to discipline kids, where gutter-culture influence is widespread in the media, it makes it clear that the parents are fighting a losing battle. (And I've heard but cannot verify that the Child Protective Services has parents scared of disciplining their children.)

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    July 16, 2010 at 6:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    By the way, I should not have written "my $.02 worth", that was ignorant. I should have written "My two Euros worth".

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    July 16, 2010 at 6:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    "Maybe you know someone who works in mental health who could vouch for the different approach used by mental health technicians as opposed to police officers. You say the man had his hands in front of him; did he appear to be a danger to anyone at that point?"
    --Zevonfan

    It seems to me a patient arriving in a mental health institution has already been in custody so everyone knows that person doesn't have a small weapon in their hand.

    Out on the street while someone is being taken into custody, the cops have just gotten there, its dark, the situation is much less controlled, and nobody knows if there's anything in the person's hands or pockets.

    That may explain the difference in technique.

    EastBeach (anonymous profile)
    July 17, 2010 at 12:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Obviously, Tevis' boys are trolling this site and responding with pathetic "damage control" posts. You punks are easy to spot.

    Justinian (anonymous profile)
    July 17, 2010 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    This was an emergency psych unit in a county hospital. Often the patients came to the ER seeking help and then became assaultive which would require them being restrained. This is one example of how a patient might be controlled by a dual effort from hospital personnel and police. Also, once admitted, our patients moved freely on the unit and would sometimes become explosive and violent. I am just making the point that there is a way to control violent behavior without getting violent back. There really are non-violent techniques that can be applied. We may just agree to disagree here. In any case I did not see any evidence that the man tased was being violent; only uncooperative when asked to submit to being handcuffed.

    Zevonfan (anonymous profile)
    July 17, 2010 at 8:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Yeah Tevis. Local boy doing what local boys do. As for Justinian go BACK to whatever town you are from clown.

    805RunningCrew (anonymous profile)
    July 17, 2010 at 7:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    The Howe family has lots of money up in the SYV. SBPD just made them more!

    805RunningCrew (anonymous profile)
    July 17, 2010 at 7:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    @Justinian you seem to be the troll. Your account was activated on July 15 , the day of your first comment. With all two of your comments on this subject. Oops!

    805RunningCrew (anonymous profile)
    July 17, 2010 at 8:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    805,Here is Justinians true aim: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_J...

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    July 18, 2010 at 2:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    To ZevonFan, who also is one of the red sweater crowd: Justin Tevis would happily throw rocks at anyone who not only disagreed with him, but wasn't the correct skin color. Furthermore Ms. Mender, I mean Zevon Fan, your flowery tribute to him was worthy of satire, which what it first appeared to be.
    Tevis is a brainless failure of a thug and putting a red sweater on him isn't going to change that.

    EZK (anonymous profile)
    July 19, 2010 at 9:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    To add to EastBeach's comment there also may be more people in a mental health ward to control those who are out of control.

    One or two cops against violent/belligerant types as opposed to a number of mental health workers changes the situation. Also, given the mentality of the people who go into these bars AND the fact that they're drunk means the cops have to watch their backs so that an angry mob doesn't gang up on them.

    Once again, that's why I get out of town after sunset.

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    July 19, 2010 at 6:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Log in to comment

    Forgotten your password?

    Sign up

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Overcast
    Temperature:
    61.0°
    Wind:
    4 SW

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Wedding Guide 2010
    • SBIFF 2010
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2010 Election Coverage
    • Blue Green Guide 2010
    • Summer Adventure Guide 2010
    • Local Heroes 2009
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • UCSBigger
    • Art Without Limits Offers Apprenticeships
    • Gut-Check Time
    • Is There Life After Dog?
    • Ray LaMontagne Gets Spacious on God Willin’
    • The ElliptiGO
    1. Montecito Motors Meltdown
    2. Core Training ... It’s Not About Your Six-Pack
    3. UCSBigger
    4. Mobile Home Battleground
    5. Santa Barbara Bank Closes $500 Million Deal
    6. Private Jetting for Less
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2010 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.